Friday, September 25, 2020

Recall Gov. Gavin Newsom


Masks Off America #masksoff

Well? Ask yourself — 

Why are you wearing one now? 



T-Cell Immunity — Dr. Atlas updates

Famous for slinging 'Science Denier' slurs at everyone against their narrative, the REAL science deniers are now the Left — ignoring science and using COVID scare tactics to do whatever they can get away with.

Most are protected by T-Cell immunity from this AND related virus exposure. Proven data from around the world, and here, explains why children, teens and most adults are at such a low risk from this China-virus.

New data and experience should also inform our resolve to #openCalifornia #openHumboldtCalifornia and #openTrinidadCalifornia 

Promoting and citing partial truths of out-of-date antibody data, with its transient immunity, is immoral.

90% of Americans are NOT susceptible to this virus still — that is untrue. 

It's a failure of our state and local public health departments to promote politically motivated policies. These policies of destructive restrictions and closures do more harm than any virus has or will.

Who are you believing? Some politically motivated msm 'reporters' (more like opinionaters) or Dr. Scott Atlas and the epidemiologists he cites. 

Sunday, September 13, 2020

CouncilguyMike Election 2020

Michael Morgan City of Trinidad California USA
Former Councilmember, Running – 
Election November 3rd 2020 

πŸ“’ πŸ˜πŸ‘ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

#TRUMP2020 πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ 
Together We Win

During this fast paced and information loaded 2020, I mostly, and most unabashedly, engage on


Weekly and and some cross-postings on my facebook page

Thursday, June 18, 2020

They Best NOT Mask US! June 18, 2020 | State Masking Mandate - Dr. Teresa Frankovich

“They are reminded that face coverings are not a replacement for other EVIDENCE-BASED measures such as physical distancing, ...” 

Would LOVE to see the NEW scientific data and evidence that backs up and requires changing current Guidance, to a Statewide Mandate. There certainly better be more than the original, “limited evidence to suggest” they COULD help, and “MAY BE HELPFUL when COMBINED” with primary interventions.” 

Are the “primary interventions” mandated now too? 
Masks and face-covers are not a substitute for any of the primary, evidence-based interventions. They may increase risk of infection and spread, if using them reduces use of effective interventions. Guess what? That’s exactly what happens too — face-coverers feel more protected than they are. Worse, feeling superior, they run ‘round yelling and shaming non-maskers, who may actually be protecting everyone better!  Non-maskers use all the effective interventions that many  of these ‘Karens” neglect.  Face-coverings, with their false sense of effectiveness, and all the masking shenanigans, are distracting, and that’s dangerous.

False feelings of effectiveness.
By NOT wearing a mask or covering my face, I’m less distracted, more protected, and I’m protecting those around me more, than a face-coverer who neglects social distancing, and forgets to frequently wash their hands, and makes more non-essential trips from home. I don’t fault them their higher-risk behavior — I understand the false feeling of protection their inferior intervention is giving them.

I challenge the motivation of mandating face-covering masks — 
they must be combined with primary interventions or they are dangerous.

June 18th 2020
Should I wear a mask?
California’s public health officials released guidance on April 1 ... The guidance DOES NOT REQUIRE people to wear face coverings ...

The use of cloth face coverings COULD reduce the transmission of COVID-19 by individuals who do not have symptoms ... officials also CAUTION that face coverings MAY INCREASE RISK ...

Face Coverings Guidance:
There MAY be a benefit to reducing asymptomatic transmission ... However, face coverings MAY increase risk...

🚫😷healthy people

Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Your "New Normal" looks like socialism-lite *

Red-flag: pre-apologies friends & others with opposing opinions – cuz you're probably gonna freak πŸ˜‚πŸš© 

I do not consent.

Your "New Normal" 
looks like socialism-lite* 
and it will not fly 
with most Americans. 

For generations, perfectly capable individuals have been deciding which businesses are essential and safe. Businesses operating in good faith with their customers and communities are patronized and thrive.

Individual Americans are best at deciding their own risks. They are best at protecting themselves and helping each other. Individuals earned and deserve their right to choose, and they deserve respectful support of their right to choose — especially when threatened or forced to give up their choice.

If you're not sure what socialism-lite* looks like, check California, New York and communities where representatives are taking away individual's freedom of choice. Take another look at individuals (so-called "Karens" haha) and friends who seem less interested in safety, and more interested in tattletale selfishness and shaming of others.

When you hear, 
"It's for your safety
it more likely means it's for their safety. 

I support others choosing for themselves, but not for me. You'll have to trust me anyway, that I'll abide your choices, so why not build on trust?  Support my right to choose differently as an individual.  Majority-rule, nanny types miss this opportunity every time. Why? Well they don't trust me, or they wouldn't threaten and restrict me. Maybe, it's that they do not trust themselves?

Abusing emergency powers and using fear to usher in some "New Normal" agenda is failing. Thankfully, like the virus with its over-blown crisis (gonna kill millions of US), we can watch this socialism-lite* agenda evaporate and die in the light of day and truth. I take it seriously, but relieved, I trust Americans and I choose .. 


*Proposed reduced-fat definition—but like most sugar-free, less fat, so-called "lite" products, it's still not good for you and tastes bad lol

socialism-lite: new-normalism? Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

socialismAny of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.